Portfolio research concept · Demonstration participants and findings

02 · AI-assisted synthesis

Faster sorting. Traceable interpretation.

AI proposed relationships across the dataset. The researcher reviewed every cluster, retained contrary evidence and wrote the final insights.

Evidence board4 themes · 136 notes
01High confidence

38 NOTES · 7 OF 8 PROFILES

Choice becomes work when every constraint arrives at once.

“I don’t need more recipes. I need a faster way to narrow things down.”
TimePreferencesConfidence
02High confidence

31 NOTES · 6 OF 8 PROFILES

People remember ingredients only when they are already planning.

“I find the spinach when it’s too late to build the week around it.”
PantryWasteReuse
03Medium-high confidence

35 NOTES · 6 OF 8 PROFILES

The planner carries invisible coordination work.

“Everyone has an opinion, but I’m still the one turning it into a plan.”
HouseholdOwnershipUpdates
04Medium confidence

32 NOTES · 5 OF 8 PROFILES

A rigid plan fails after the first unexpected evening.

“If Tuesday changes, the whole week stops making sense.”
SwapLeftoversRecovery

Quality checks

What the model could not decide.

Interpretive decisions remained explicit so that speed did not create false confidence.

MODEL SUGGESTION

Combine “routine” and “flexibility”

Researcher decision: kept separate. Routine reduced decision load, while flexibility described recovery when the plan changed.

CONTRARY EVIDENCE

Two participants enjoyed spontaneous shopping

Researcher decision: retained as an edge case. MealMap should support light planning without treating spontaneity as failure.

LANGUAGE REVIEW

“Food inventory” felt operational

Researcher decision: reframed. “Use what you have” matched participants’ language more closely.

Next view

Turn the themes into product decisions.

View recommendations →