Portfolio research concept · Demonstration participants and findings

03 · Recommendations

Four opportunities, ordered by evidence.

Recommendations were prioritised by user value, breadth of supporting evidence and the effort required to test the underlying assumption.

02 · TEST NEXTValue 5/5 · Effort 3/5

Make ingredients useful, not merely visible.

Suggest meals and substitutions around a small set of ingredients a person wants to use soon.

Design principleAsk for a few ingredients, never a full inventory.
03 · VALIDATEValue 4/5 · Effort 3/5

Share preferences before sharing a finished plan.

Let household members signal availability, exclusions and “not tonight” preferences without making everyone a planner.

Design principleCollect lightweight input; preserve one clear owner.
04 · EXPLOREValue 4/5 · Effort 4/5

Help the plan recover when life changes.

Offer one-tap swaps that protect ingredient use and move displaced meals to a sensible later date.

Design principleChanging one evening should not break the week.

Opportunity map

Prioritise learning, not feature volume.

The first experiments target the riskiest assumptions behind the highest-value opportunities.

Higher user value
Quick winsStrategic betsUseful additionsLater
Higher delivery effort →

Next research

A focused validation plan.

Each activity is designed to answer one decision before the concept grows.

WEEK 1

Concept sorting

Compare three ways to begin planning and observe which reduces hesitation.

WEEK 2

Ingredient prompt test

Test whether selecting three ingredients feels useful without becoming admin.

WEEK 3

Household hand-off

Prototype preference requests and assess whether they reduce coordination work.

MealMap research direction

Make the next meal easier without turning food into a project.

Return to overview